English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

By reflecting Austin’s description of “general habitual obedience”, Hart examines the difference between two characters, validity and efficacy, of legal systems and so, by this clarification, discusses the possibility that these two characters can be connected under certain social situation through what he calls “the internal point of view”. According to this possibility, “Thesis of Rules” claims that the composite character of a legal system should be described as officials must generally hold the internal point of view to secondary rules, while ordinary citizens, along with officials themselves, are generally obedient to primary ones. And these can be considered as the necessary conditions and foundations of the actual existence of a legal system.

Secondary Rules, the Internal Point of View and the Foundations of a Legal System: a Re-understanding to H. L. A. Hartrs Theory of Legal System