English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper compares the mental health education between Chinese and American universities based on field visits to 6 universities. As shown in the investigations, the differences lie in 4 aspects. Firstly, the working mechanism of mental health education is horizontal in America but threedimensional in China. Secondly, American universities focus on problem students while their Chinese counterparts concentrate on the entire group. Thirdly, American psychological counselors are only in charge of counseling services, whereas in China psychological counselors shoulder extra responsibilities. Fourthly, American universities have standard crisis management procedure while Chinese universities attach importance to pre-crisis warnings. The conclusion is that Chinese universities should maintain their characteristics and strengths, and at the same time, draw inspirations from their American counterparts. Keywords—Chinese and American universities; mental health education; comparison; inspiration

Comparison of Mental Health Education Between Chinese and American Universities A Field Study Based on 6 Universities