English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article is devoted to the studying the problems of determining the degree of personal data privacy, posted on the Internet. The authors of the article note absence in legal science and legislation of a unified approach to determining degree of openness or confidentiality of such personal data, including lack of a unified approach to the recognition of such information as publicly available personal data. The article considers the position of arbitration courts, left unchanged by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in 2018, according to which only information contained in publicly available sources of personal data is recognized as public personal data. Taking into account the lack of written consent of users to post information about them in public sources in social networks, information of social networks was not recognized as public personal data. In this regard, the article raises questions about the basis for the processing of personal data posted on the Internet, including the situation where the subject of personal data seeks to ensure that such information becomes public, when placing personal data due to the requirements of the law, while using technologies "BIG DATE", as well as when using such data in the work of public

Regarding the issue of recognition of personal data, posted on the Internet as publicly available personal data