English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

By comparing basic approximate concepts like langue, parole and discourse as well as accomplishment, cultivation and quality, this paper interprets the connotation of language accomplishment again, so as to clarify the basic connotation of college teachers’ language accomplishment. Investigation is conducted from four dimensions which are college teachers’ “language cultural cultivation, language expression ability, language application habit, and language communication attitude”. Keywords—Language Accomplishment; College; Teacher I. LANGUAGE AND TEACHER LANGUAGE A. Langue, parole and discourse Generally speaking, language refers to the symbol system used by human being to express different meanings by making different sounds. Composed of phonetics and semantics, it is a tool used by human being to exchange ideas, transfer information and impart knowledge, a tool for human communication, and a tool for human thinking. Such connotation is explained in a narrow sense. Language frequently mentioned by people means verbal language. In a broad sense, language includes oral language, written language and body language. In a broader sense, language can also be understood as “the combination of forms and meanings formed by information communication in virtue of various tools among human beings”. According to the definition about language, language can be divided into broad sense and narrow sense, with varying extensions. The modern linguist from Switzerland, F. de Saussure divided language into two aspects: langue and parole. Simply speaking, parole refers to the aggregation of people’s speeches, including individual combinations transferring with the speaker’s will and pronunciation behaviors about the will required to realize these combinations. We can also say that parole is the behavior of individual will and intelligence. [1] At the beginning of the 20 th century, the Swiss linguist Saussure proposed and discussed the distinction between langue and parole. He considered that langue is a social phenomenon; it is a special covenant imposed on all social members by the society and a norm that must be observed. It possesses characteristics like stability and chronicity. Parole is individual phenomenon or activity, and the behavior of individual will and intelligence. Individuals express their ideas and emotions through speech events, so as to realize the purpose of social contact. Therefore, it has characteristics like instability and transiency. It is thus clear that langue is the tool and product of parole. As a symbol system of expressing ideas and a thinking mode, it is static, formal and national. As the specific speech event or speech act of human being, parole includes result and achievement of speech – verbal speech works and written speech works. It is the systematic application of language, and it is dynamic and individual. According to this theory, parole refers to the activity in which people grasp and apply language, and it is the individual behavior. As the explicit sign of reflecting language use and language expression level, it is closely related to language accomplishment[2]. It is hard to find the rule, so it has individuality. The so-called “discourse” refers to the language spoken or written by people, it is reflected in interaction between man and man, and it has sociality. Discourse is the operation mode of parole, action and exchange, idea and emotion, object and tool, and time and place. [3] According to the above discussion, it is known that langue is abstract, while discourse and parole are concrete. However, the scope of discourse is larger than that of parole, and it covers some nonverbal materials. [4] Relation of the three concepts can be explained with the following figure. Fig.1 Relation of Langue,Discourse and Parole

New Understanding on Connotation of College Teachers Language Accomplishment