English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Poverty is a nightmare that is very scary for the world's population and one of the global issues in every country that is developing and growing and poverty is where a person has a condition that is not mimiliki sufficient resources and income, so the lack of basic necessities such as clothing, shelter, nutritious meals , clean water, and health care. To address the issue of poverty government programs have been rolled out to the poor one of which is a program addressing poverty through the Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia kelompok usaha bersama (KUBE). Article aims to determine the effect of directly or indirectly variable budgets, experience, old school and the facilitation of the provincial poverty rate in the region of Sulawesi and Borneo islands through increased revenue. This study uses data regarding the number of members of KUBE budget recipients, Experience, Old School, Facilitation and Revenue KUBE members, to determine the independent variables (Budget, Experience, Old School and Facilitation) and intervening variables (income) and the dependent variable (Poverty). Budgets are directly variable (X1), Experience (X2), Old School (X3), Facilitation (X4) significantly affect poverty (Y2). While it indirectly through the variable income (Y1), budget variables influence significantly to poverty. While the experience variable, Old School, Facilitation no significant effect on poverty (Y2). It was concluded that Influence the Budget directly to poverty and significant positive effect but indirectly influence the budget to poverty through income positive and significant impact. While the influence of experience, old school, and facilitation directly to poverty have a significant negative effect whereas the effect of indirectly Old School to poverty through income had no significant effect.

Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUBE) And Poverty Level Performance In Sulawesi and Kalimantan Areas