English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The logical consequence of the concept of regional autonomy is the presence of fiscal decentralization. The independence of rural communities in the formulation of programs for the administration of governance and development at the village level becomes the space of urgency of village financial management, because substantially, through the enormous financial support Central Government, Provincial Government and Regency / City Government, the village is required to be able to organize governance and development implementation properly and correctly. Furthermore, increasing public demand for good governance has encouraged the central government and regional governments to implement public accountability. Krina describes accountability as a principle that guarantees that every administration activity can be accounted openly by the perpetrator to those affected by the implementation of the policy. Based on the problem, the paper builds on literature reviews covering various dimensions of Open Government and its applicability to village finance to build the empirical evidence and the frameworks. Keywords—Transparency, Village Finance system, Open Government Partnership,

Village Finance System (SISKEUDES): Transparency of Village Asset Management Toward Open Government Partnership