English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper studies the second major reform of the European Court of Human Rights, which was mainly brought about by the entry into force of Protocol No. 14 to the European Convention of Human Rights. It firstly analyses the main contents of Protocol No. 14, then compares the statistics around the implementation of this Protocol. The statistics show that the new judicial formations introduced by this Protocol are effective in reducing the number of pending applications and in improving the filtering ability of applications by the Court. The new admissibility criterion should be studied after its application by the single-judge and the three-judge committee. In conclusion, the second major reform of European Court of Human Rights is useful and meaningful. Keywords—filtering capacity of applications; European Court of Human Rights; European Convention on Human Rights; Protocol No. 14; admissibility criterion

On the Second Major Reform of European Court of Human Rights