English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this article is to examine government fiscal policy which establish Bonded Logistic Center (BLC) as an alternative of offering conventional fiscal incentives by using Supply-side Tax Policy perspective. This study also compares the implementation, advantages and disadvantages of conventional fiscal incentives and Bonded Logistic Centre on shipyard industry. This research occupies mix method approach. The data is collected through literature review, in-depth interview whereas then the simulation of industry transaction is occupied as quantitative aspect. The research found that based on Supply Side tax policy perspective the establishment of Bonded Logistic Centre is more efficient for the cost of taxation aspect, compare to that of conventional fiscal incentives which has to be applied on individual entity bases. In addition, establishing Bonded Logistic Centre seem more beneficial for the logistic cost aspect, administrative and bureaucracy procedures. Keywords—fiscal policy; fiscal incentives; Bonded Logistic Center; supply side tax policy

Bonded Logistic Center: Policy Analysis on Perspective Supply Side Tax Policy on ShipyardIndustry