English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In both Chinese and Western contexts, “translation” has the connotation of “interpretation”. James Legge’s “translation” of Taoist classics is accompanied by “interpretation” in his “translation event” from beginning to end. Ancient Chinese commentators hold that what “Ching”(经) renders is “Tao”(道). Legge’s “translating Classics”(译经) also has the dimension of “rendering Tao”(述道). “Tao” is based on “ben”(本), and that “ben” being established, “Tao” naturally grows up. By the approaches of “ben” and “Tao”, perhaps we can get the dimensions of “context”, “language”, “text”, “connotation” and “interpretation”, and thereby probe into Legge’s translation and commentary of Taoist classics. 理雅各译解道家经典研究的可能进路 雷阿勇 a,* 闽江学院外国语学院,福州,福建,中国 350108 ayongfj@126.com

Possible Approaches to Research of James Legge’s Translation and Commentary of Taoist Classics