English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The presence of the Election Smart House (RPP) as one of the national priority programs which launched by the General Election Commission (KPU) since 2016. It has become an important political education, especially how people learn democracy and electoral materials about democracy. Until end of 2018, RPP was established in all districts/cities and province. Currently, there are 327 RPP in Indonesia. Unfortunately the existing RPP had not been managed properly. Effective management will make the RPP one of the centers of community political learning resources which will certainly contribute to improving the quality of democracy in the region. This article aims to analyze how effective forms of RPP management as well as find solutions to the use of RPP as a means of community political education This research used Research and Development (R & D) with more intensive through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and in-depth interviews. The results indicated that standardization of RPP management needs to be developed in order to effective as a center for community political learning.

The Election Smart House Management as a Society Political Education Facility