English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The authors consider the main existing models of national and supranational strategic planning. Currently, the western and eastern models of strategic planning are most widely used. Within the Western model, American and European stand out. The authors note the advantages and disadvantages of each of the models. In addition, the national models of the USA, France, Germany, Japan and China, as well as the EU and NATO, are briefly characterized. The article provides a brief description of national strategic planning procedures and the role of various government bodies in its process. Differences in countries and models in attracting independent expertise for strategic planning were also noted. According to the observations of the authors, signs of slow convergence of various national and regional strategic planning models are currently observed. Keywords—strategic planning; plan; state planning bodies; strategic planning model; forecast; planning procedure

A brief comparative analysis of strategic planning models