English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper applied the International Standard Maturity Criterion to self-assess the maturity of the quality of robots science popular education and compared its differences cross-strait. The research method used was experts’ and scholars’ questionnaire survey. Five assessment dimensions of ISO9004 guideline including popular science education system, management responsibility, resource management, service implementation and measurement, analysis and improvement were used to design the questionnaire. Data were collected from the experts and scholars from cross-strait. The study found that the total maturity of five dimensions of robots science popular education in Fujian fell between grade 3 (with a formal stable system plan) to grade 4 (continuing continuous improvement), and the total maturity of Taiwan fell to 3 points. Based on this, the study will provide government agencies, academics, and industry with suggestions for them to improve the policies and methods when they offer the robots science popular education. Keywords—robots science popular education; international standards of maturity; self-assess

The Maturity Evaluation and Comparison of Robots Science Popular Education between Fujian and Taiwan