English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article is devoted to the problem of choosing the model of secondary education in Russia in the second half of the 19th century. The authors analyze the discussion between supporters of classical and real (practically oriented) education, the goals and results of school reforms of the 19th century, the activity of the Ministry of Public Education. They come to the conclusion that the dispute about the relationship between classical and real (practically oriented) education was not resolved until 1917. Keywords—classical and real education; practically oriented education; Ministry of Public Education; school reforms; gymnasiums; real school; practically oriented school

Discussion on Classical and Real Education in Russia in the Second Half of the 19th Century