English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It is found in empirical analysis that although the substantive reform of court trial has improved the situation in which traditional criminal trials become formalistic to some degree, thereare still problems in the investigation of documentary evidence in criminal trial, such as chaotic procedure of proof-providing, stylized procedure of cross examination and simplified procedure of certification. The main reason lies in the investigation-centered lawsuit structure and the current careless court investigation rules. In the future, under the framework of trial-centered lawsuit system reform, it is necessary to refine and improve the evidence investigation rules for operational criminal trial, and give play to the relevant supporting mechanisms on this basis, to achieve substantive and effective court investigation in criminal trials. Keywords—substantiation of court trial; documentary evidence; court investigation; empirical study

proceedings of the 4th international conference on economics, management, law and education (emle 2018)

Empirical Study on Court Investigation of Documentary Evidence in Criminal Trial Taking the Substantive Trial Demonstration Court of the Court of C City as a Sample for Analysis