English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Real-time display viewpoint ranking information in the divergent discussion process, has a great significance in group discussion of Hall for Workshop of Meta-synthetic Engineering. Since divergent discussion has the characteristics of continuity and randomized complexity, a viewpoint ranking method based on PageRank in group discussion is proposed. On the basis of information organization model, timing factor and semantic relations of experts’ comments are taken into account to compute the support degrees among experts. The PR values of experts’ viewpoints can be calculated based on the support degrees, and then ranking experts’ viewpoints according to the PR values. The example is given to validate the validity and practicability of this method. Introduction Hall for Workshop of Meta-synthetic Engineering (HWME) is guided by the meta-synthetic method, it is a decision support system for the purpose of studying the "open complex giant system" and solving complex problems [1-4]. Expert group is a core part of HWME [5], and experts play a major role in presenting, discussing, constructing questions and making final decision. The computer technology and expert knowledge, wisdom, data and various kinds of information are combined by group discussion. Therefore, how to support group discussion will be a key subject to study the development of HWME [6]. Divergent and convergent discussions are included in effective group discussion. At present, in the face of convergent discussion, the consensus algorithm of group decision is proposed in the literature [7], which makes the viewpoints of expert group finally reach the agreement; In the literature [8], based on the complete consistent linguistic judgment matrix, a ranking method is proposed; In the literature [9], a group decision method based on interval two tuple linguistic information is proposed to solve the problem of ranking schemes; In the literature [10], a method for ranking the weights of the schemes based on the interval number complementary judgment matrix is proposed. The domestic and foreign researchers have been fully studied the ranking problem in convergent discussion. In the face of divergent discussion, foreign researchers propose Information system model based on problem [11] and Carneades dispute framework [12]; There have been some research in domestic, e.g. Electronic Common Brain Audiovisual Room (ECBAR) is proposed in the literature [13]; Group discussion environment is proposed in the literature [14]; Cyberspace for Workshop of Meta-synthetic Engineering (CWME) is proposed in the literature [15]. The information organization, process control and the result visualization in the divergent 501 Advances in Computer Science Research (ACRS), volume 54 International Conference on Computer Networks and Communication Technology (CNCT2016)

Viewpoint Ranking Method Based on PageRank in Group Discussion