English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study focused on analysing dysphemism found in hoax. The previous studies on forms and use of dysphemism in the grammatical units, and yet did not use hoaxes as the object of the research. This qualitative research relies on data documented from website cekfakta.com and turnbackhoax.id. Data were verified, processed, and analysed using the theory of Semantic. The result was presented with brief descriptions. The result indicates the hoax makers used seven forms of dysphemism: taboo language, curse, human and animal comparison, physical character, the term mental abnormalities, -IST dysphemism, and dysphemism with characters or occupations that have negative images. Dysphemism in the hoaxes was used for insulting, showing dislike, giving negative descriptions, expressing anger, showing disapproving, showing disrespect, criticizing, exaggerating something, blaspheming, showing something that was of low value, and showing astonishment.

The Form and Use of Dysphemism in Hoax