English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This research aimed at finding out (1) whether any significant difference of students’ writing skill between those who were taught using student team skill division (STAD) and those who were taught using think pair share (TPS); (2) whether the students with a high attitude who were taught through STAD had better writing skill as compared to who were taught through TPS; (3) whether the students with a low attitude who were taught through STAD had better writing skill as compared to who were taught through TPS; (4) whether any interaction between techniques (STAD and Think Pair Share technique) and students’ attitude on students’ writing skill. This research was carried out at SMP N 34 Pekanbaru. The design of this research was quasi experimental research with 2x2 factorial designs. The samples of this research comprised 35 students of class VIII.2 as an experimental group and 35 students of class VIII 3 as a control group, which were selected using cluster random sampling technique. Hyphothesis 1, 2, and 3 were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test, while the hyphotesis 4 was analyzed using two way anova. Hyphotesis 1 resulted p value 0.000 < 0.05, which meant that there was a significant difference of students’ writing skill between those who were taught using student team skill division (STAD) and those who were taught using think pair share (TPS). The hyphotesis 2 resulted p value 0.000 < 0.05, which meant that the students with a high attitude who were taught through STAD had better writing skill as compared to who were taught through TPS. The hyphotesis 3 resulted p value 0.006 < 0.05, which meant that the students with a low attitude who were taught through STAD had better writing skill as compared to who were taught through TPS. The hyphotesis 4 resulted p value 0.565 > 0.05, which means that there was no any interaction between techniques (STAD and Think Pair Share technique) and students’ attitude on students’ writing skill.

Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) and Students’ Attitude Towards Writing Achievement at SMP N 34 Pekanbaru