English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In criminal law, there are three main issues which become the scope of criminal act, criminal liability or sanctions. Not all actions proven by the elements can cause the offender to be convicted if he cannot be blamed so that criminal liability cannot be held. In practice many cases involving people in good faith are also held responsible for the crime. One of them is the makers of key duplicates. Empirical duplicate key makers are very much needed by the community, but they are not infrequently involved in criminal cases when the perpetrators who use their services use duplicate keys that they make to commit crimes, especially theft. By using empirical juridical research methods, it is concluded that (i) duplicate key makers are aware of the possibility that their duplicated keys are misused by others, so they continue to apply the precautionary principle in serving consumers, (ii) however, legally they are not can be accounted for unless it can be proven intent to participate in being part of a theft syndicate.

Criminal Responsibility of Key Duplicate Makers in Pekanbaru City in the Event of Crime Using the Duplicate Key