English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article analyzes the right of procurator to the opinion of a settlement agreement with his participation in consideration of civil and arbitration cases by courts. Despite the fact that issues related to the matter and procedure for the opinion of a settlement agreement were subject of scientific analysis, not all aspects received proper coverage, such as the participation of procurator in the opinion of a settlement agreement. This fact, as well as various positions of civil and arbitration law on this issue, have created contradictions in judicial practice and science. Meanwhile, the procurator's right to enter into a settlement agreement would allow expanding the scope of resolving legal conflicts in the most preferable and effective way. To address this issue, the legal nature of the settlement agreement and the standing of procurator were studied. Based on undertaken a study, authors come to the conclusion that court practice and academic circles do not deny the possibility of opinion of settlement agreement by a procurator, on the basis of which such a legal approach can be perceived by the current legislation.

Legal Opinions of Settlement Agreement by Procurator