English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Productivity means as a comparison between the results achieved (output) and the overall resources used (input). Work productivity is a process to produce or increase the results of goods and services as high as possible by utilizing resources as efficiently as possible. In this study, productivity will be measured through the impact of physical work environment, non-physical work environment and work motivation. The research method used is a quantitative method with a descriptive research approach and associative analysis. The number of sample in this study was 82 employees who were determined using simple random sampling technique with Slovin method. The data obtained are primary data through questionnaires and processed using statistical software. This study has fulfilled the instrument test and classic assumption test, namely: normality test, linearity test, multicollinearity test, and heteroscedasticity test. The description of statistics in the study shows that the physical work environment, non-physical work environment, work motivation and work productivity have homogeneous data. The results of the analysis in the study showed that there were positive and significant effects (1) physical work environment on work motivation, (2) non-physical work environment on work motivation, (3) work motivation on work productivity, (4) work motivation on work productivity, (5) work motivation as an intervening variable between physical work environment and work productivity, (6) work motivation as an intervening variable between non-physical work environment and work productivity. The results of the latest data processing showed results that did not significantly influence the non-physical work environment on work productivity. Keywords—physical work environment, non-physical work environment, work motivation, work productivity

Are Physical and Non-Physical Working Environment Effect Employees Productivity with Motivation as an Intervening Factor?