English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

-In every legal case, especially a case that is special in nature, always brings up two side by side. The hegemony of one field of law over other fields of law raises losses for those who experience dominance of the Law Enforcement Officials. The emergence of differences in understanding, in the end will only lead to interpretive authority. That is, the result of a valid interpretation is an interpretation that is revealed only by public authorization by utilizing power and authority. As a result, public law, in this case is criminal law, presupposes the status of the legal subject. Criminal law no longer matters whether it is a persoonor a recharge persoon. Although, the Supreme Court has issued Supreme Court Regulation No. 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Corporate Crimes, but the interpretation of the Supreme Court Regulation is still returned to the interpreting public authority.

Philosophical Criticism of the Betrayal of the Criminal Law Rechtspersoon as a Legal Subject