English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article throws light onto the issues of evaluation of the effect of primary indicators of innovative activity on its outcomes. The authors propose an adaptive method of evaluating the effect of primary indicators of technological innovations on the outcomes of innovative activity in the region based on literature analysis and own solutions. To do that, they performed a comparative analysis and evaluation of such indicators as the volume of innovative products, works, and services, expenditures connected with technological innovations, and the number of used state-of-the-art manufacturing technologies of federal subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District in 2015-2017. To identify the effect of primary indicators of innovative activity on the release of innovative products, the authors calculated correlation interdependencies of indicators. Study results show that the level of correlation dependence is high or average in the Russian Federation in general and in most federal subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District (FEFD). This demonstrates the effect of primary indicators of technological innovations on the outcomes of innovative activity in federal subjects of the FEFD.

advances in economics, business and management research/advances in economics, business and management research

Evaluation of the Effect of Primary Indicators of Technological Innovations on the Outcomes of Innovative Activity in Federal Subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District