English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The major-element and most of the trace-element data from the different laboratories that contributed to the study of samples recovered during Leg 82 are presented in the following tables. The different basalt groups, identified on the basis of their chemical properties (major and trace elements), were defined from the data available on board the Glomar Challenger as the cruise progressed (see site chapters, all sites, this volume). Most of the data obtained since the end of the cruise and presented in these tables confirm the classification that was proposed by the shipboard party (see site chapters, all sites, this volume). Nevertheless, special mention should be made about Site 564. The shipboard party proposed a single chemical group at this site but noticed significant variations down the hole, mainly in trace-element data. However, the range of variation was small compared to the precision of the measurements. These variations were confirmed by the onshore studies (see papers in Part IV of this volume, especially Brannon's paper, partly devoted to this topic)

Local versus Regional Mantle Heterogeneities: Evidence from Hygromagmaphile Elements