English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the navigational plots shown in Figures 1-7, the ships' tracks in the area of each drill site are annotated with time marks that can be related to the times shown on the seismic profiler sections. The navigational plots appear in sequence, and each plot is followed by the profiler sections that appear in that particular plot. Sonobuoy station numbers are preceded by the letter R in the profiler photographs. Sites 275, 276, and 278 were not surveyed as drill sites by Eltanin because sufficient profiler data were already available from previous Eltanin sections. Sites 277, 282, and 284 were chosen as entirely new sites during Leg 29, but except for Site 277 (not shown), enough data were already available to obviate additional surveys. The rest of the sites were surveyed in detail by Eltanin. The Sonobuoy data from these surveys appear separately (Houtz, 1975). Note that the navigational control of Eltanin Cruise 27 and Conrad 9 is inferior to that of the other cruises. All the records were made with an airgun sound-source except on Eltanin 39, when a compressor breakdown necessitated the use of a 10-kj sparker.

Seismic Reflection Survey of Leg 29 Drill Sites