English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Though currently approved for visual assessment only, there is evidence to suggest that quantification of amyloid-β (Aβ) PET images may reduce interreader variability and aid in the monitoring of treatment effects in clinical trials. Quantification typically involves a regional atlas in standard space, requiring PET images to be spatially normalized. Different uptake patterns in Aβ-positive and Aβ-negative subjects, however, make spatial normalization challenging. In this study, we proposed a method to spatially normalize 18 F-flutemetamol images using a synthetic template based on principal-component images to overcome these challenges. &lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; 18 F-flutemetamol PET and corresponding MR images from a phase II trial (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 70), including subjects ranging from Aβ-negative to Aβ-positive, were spatially normalized to standard space using an MR-driven registration method (SPM12). 18 F-flutemetamol images were then intensity-normalized using the pons as a reference region. Principal-component images were calculated from the intensity-normalized images. A linear combination of the first 2 principal-component images was then used to model a synthetic template spanning the whole range from Aβ-negative to Aβ-positive. The synthetic template was then incorporated into our registration method, by which the optimal template was calculated as part of the registration process, providing a PET-only–driven registration method. Evaluation of the method was done in 2 steps. First, coregistered gray matter masks generated using SPM12 were spatially normalized using the PET- and MR-driven methods, respectively. The spatially normalized gray matter masks were then visually inspected and quantified. Second, to quantitatively compare the 2 registration methods, additional data from an ongoing study were spatially normalized using both methods, with correlation analysis done on the resulting cortical SUV ratios. &lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; All scans were successfully spatially normalized using the proposed method with no manual adjustments performed. Both visual and quantitative comparison between the PET- and MR-driven methods showed high agreement in cortical regions. 18 F-flutemetamol quantification showed strong agreement between the SUV ratios for the PET- and MR-driven methods (&lt;em&gt;R&lt;/em&gt; 2 = 0.996; pons reference region). &lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The principal-component template registration method allows for robust and accurate registration of 18 F-flutemetamol images to a standardized template space, without the need for an MR image.

Spatial Normalization of 18F-Flutemetamol PET Images Using an Adaptive Principal-Component Template

Spatial Normalization of ¹⁸F-Flutemetamol PET Images Using an Adaptive Principal-Component Template