English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Radioimmunotherapies with monoclonal antibodies to the B-lymphocyte antigen 20 (CD20) are effective treatments for B-cell lymphomas, but U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved radioimmunotherapies exclusively use radiolabeled murine antibodies, potentially limiting redosing. The Food and Drug Administration recently approved 2 unlabeled anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, obinutuzumab and ofatumumab, termed next generation as they are humanized (obinutuzumab) or fully human (ofatumumab), thus potentially allowing a greater potential for redosing than with previous-generation anti-CD20 antibodies, including rituximab (chimeric) and tositumomab (murine), which contain more murine peptide sequences. We prepared 89 Zr-ofatumumab and 89 Zr-obinituzumab and assessed their tumor targeting by PET/CT imaging and their biodistribution in a preclinical mouse model with CD20 xenografts to determine whether these antibodies have potential as theranostics or for radioimmunotherapy. Methods: Obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, rituximab, tositumomab, and human IgG (as control) were radiolabeled with 89 Zr. Raji Burkitt lymphoma xenografts were established in severe combined immunodeficient mice. Mice with palpable tumors ( n = 4-9) were injected with 89 Zr-obinutuzumab, 89 Zr-ofatumumab, 89 Zr-rituximab, 89 Zr-tositumomab, or 89 Zr-IgG, with small-animal PET/CT images acquired at 1, 3, and 7 d after injection, and then sacrificed for biodistribution analyses. Results: At 1, 3, and 7 d after injection, all anti-CD20 antibodies showed clear tumor uptake on PET/CT, with minimal tumor uptake of IgG. Biodistribution data showed significantly ( P &lt; 0.005) higher tumor uptake for obinutuzumab (41.4 ± 7.6 percentage injected dose [%ID]/g), ofatumumab (32.6 ± 17.5 %ID/g), rituximab (28.6 ± 7.6 %ID/g), and tositumomab (28.0 ± 6.5 %ID/g) than IgG (7.2 ± 1.2 %ID/g). Tositumomab had much higher splenic uptake (186.4 ± 49.7 %ID/g, P &lt; 0.001) than the other antibodies. Conclusion:  89 Zr-labeled obinutuzumab and ofatumumab localized to tumor as well as or better than labeled rituximab and tositumomab, 2 monoclonal antibodies that have been used previously in B-cell lymphoma radioimmunotherapy, and both obinutuzumab and ofatumumab have the potential for repeated dosing.

Evaluation of Next-Generation Anti-CD20 Antibodies Labeled with89Zr in Human Lymphoma Xenografts

Evaluation of Next-Generation Anti-CD20 Antibodies Labeled with⁸⁹Zr in Human Lymphoma Xenografts