English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can accurately be determined using (51)Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma clearance counting but is time-consuming and requires technical skills and equipment not always available in imaging departments. (68)Ga-EDTA can be readily available using an onsite generator, and PET/CT enables both imaging of renal function and accurate camera-based quantitation of clearance of activity from blood and its appearance in the urine. This study aimed to assess agreement between (68)Ga-EDTA GFR ((68)Ga-GFR) and (51)Cr-EDTA GFR ((51)Cr-GFR), using serial plasma sampling and PET imaging.

the journal of nuclear medicine

<sup>68</sup>Ga-EDTA PET/CT Imaging and Plasma Clearance for Glomerular Filtration Rate Quantification: Comparison to Conventional <sup>51</sup>Cr-EDTA

68Ga-EDTA PET/CT Imaging and Plasma Clearance for Glomerular Filtration Rate Quantification: Comparison to Conventional 51Cr-EDTA

⁶⁸Ga-EDTA PET/CT Imaging and Plasma Clearance for Glomerular Filtration Rate Quantification: Comparison to Conventional ⁵¹Cr-EDTA