English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

First paragraph: On May 16th 2008, the Court of Arbitration for Sport handeddown its decision in Oscar Pistorius v The International Association ofAthletics Federations. Pistorius is a class-43 (double amputee) athlete fromSouth Africa, born in November 1986. His legs were amputated below the kneeswhen he was 11 months old because he had been born without fibulas (a lower-legbone which supports about 15% of an adult’s body weight). He started running atthe beginning 2004 to assist his rehabilitation from a serious rugby injury, butsuch was his progress in the discipline that he competed in the September 2004paralympics, using prosthetic titanium lower legs manufactured by a company inIceland. He came first in the 200m. At the 2006 Athletics World Championships hewon gold medals in the 100, 200 and 400m events and he remains the world recordholder at all those distances for class-43 athletes. Pistorius asked to beconsidered for selection in South Africa’s 2008 Olympic squad in the 400m and inthe 4 x 400m relay, using his prostheses but in all other respects running onequal terms against the other particip

“Just One of the Challenges of 21st-Century Life”: Oscar Pistorius in the Court of Arbitration for Sport