English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The quest for new methods to improve strength and athletic performance is perpetual. The squat exercise is frequently employed by both healthy and rehabilitating athletes. This closed-kinetic chain task is popular for reducing tibial-femoral shear forces in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation [1], patella-femoral tracking dysfunctions (PFTD), and total knee replacement therapy [2]. However, it is not always applicable or advantageous to use a traditional back squat. Individuals with various co-morbidities of the shoulder or spine may experience limitations in performing this exercise. People with a history of shoulder impingement, labral injuries, or thoracic outlet may not be able to position the bar correctly behind the shoulders in order to perform a traditional back squat [3]. In addition, individuals with a history of lumbosacral dysfunction may have dif iculty using a traditional back squat to challenge the lower extremities with a load that does not surpass the tolerance of the spine [3]. Therefore, an alternative exercise, such as the belt squat, can prioritize the load to the lower body musculature and be an effective substitute for the traditional back squat.

Comparison of muscle activation of 3 different hip belt squat techniques