English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

.. Objectives: To evaluate the severity of post-operative pain after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar using two different techniques i.e. comma incision and standard Wards incision. Study Design: Interventional study. Setting: Department of Oral surgery, Isra Dental College Hospital. Period: From January 2016 to June 2016. Material & Methods: A sample of 50 patients of impacted third molar was selected by non-probability purposive sampling for tooth extraction either by conventional technique or by coma shaped incision. Post-operative amount of pain was measured on 1st, 3rd and 7th day respectively. Results: Mean ± SD age in group A and B was noted as 28.5 ± 4.32 and 27.2 ± 4.39 years respectively. Male and female in groups A and B were noted as 16 (64%) and 9 (36%), & 14 (56%) and 11 (44%) respectively. Right and left lower mandibular teeth extraction in groups A and B were noted 11 and 14, & 10 and 15 respectively. Pain was measured after extraction at day 1, day 3 and day 7. Conclusion: The Coma incision was preferable over the conventional methodthe standard Ward`s incision because of lesser degree of post-operative pain.

Evaluation of severity of pain after removal of impacted third molar by comparing two flap designs.