English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

One of language features which can be applied to reach the persuasive goal is interpersonal metadiscourse. Although it has been frequently investigated in written texts, research on interpersonal metadiscourse in campaign speeches is still relatively hard to find, whereas a lot of features of interpersonal metadiscourse in campaign speeches are used as persuasive strategies. This study aims to explain the meaning of interpersonal metadiscourse markers applied in Barack Obama’s campaign speeches related to his persuasive strategy. The data are analyzed by using Dafouz’s (2008) theory of interpersonal metadiscourse markers categorization. The method used in this study is descriptive qualitative. The results reveal that all interpersonal metadiscourse markers categories, namely hedges, certainty markers, attributors, attitude markers, and commentaries, are used in Barack Obama’s campaign speeches. High frequency of use of attitude markers and commentaries shows that Obama in his campaign speeches tries to build emotional ties with his audience as his persuasive strategy.

INTERPERSONAL METADISCOURSE MARKERS AS PERSUASIVE STRATEGIES IN BARACK OBAMA’S 2012 CAMPAIGN SPEECHES