English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this new era of recognized constitutional labour rights, one aspect of labour relations — sympathetic action — remains, for the most part, judicially unexamined. This article examines the case law to demonstrate that there is a constitutional argument that both the statutory prohibition on sympathetic action, and the hostility to sympathetic action in the common law of contract and tort, infringe on the freedoms in section 2 of the Charter. However, there is no necessary connection between a right to undertake sympathetic action and a right to strike, nor is freedom of association the only Charter right that can protect sympathetic action. Ultimately, an absolute ban on sympathetic action under Canadian labour law violates the Charter and must be removed; and the hostility of the law of tort and the law of contract to sympathetic action also contravenes Charter values.

“Lest You Undermine Our Struggle”: Sympathetic Action and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms