English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Since 2000, every five years there has ocurred a rebellion in Ecuador that has sometimes ended in the government overthrow. Twenty years ago, Mahuad goverment fell; in 2005, Gutiérrez; in 2010, there was insubordination against Correa known as the 30-S; in 2015, the “black flags” rejected the Executive in the social networks and in the streets; In 2019, there was an unprecedented national strike against the Lenín Moreno government. This work compares the fall of Gutiérrez; the 30-S and the national strike of October 2019 from the crowd logic, according to the propose of Hardt and Negri, and trying to answer the following question: In each of the revolts, the post-truth call about these events, disseminated by what we know as public opinion, has it been redefined by political power or by the collective action of protesters on the streets and on social media?

¿Medios versus redes? Posverdad en la lógica de la multitud.