English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

any studies have attempted to assess the impact of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on learning. These studies focus either on the achievement of linguistic skills such as speaking, listening, writing and reading (Garrett 1998) or on motivation (Skinner & Austin, 1999, Rico Garcia & Arias, 2000). Concerning grammar teaching, while some studies find a significant advantage of these techniques, others find no significant difference between CALL and other teaching methods. For instance, a positive impact of CALL has been found by Nutta (1998) investigating the effect of computer-based

Is computer-assisted language learning efficient for grammar learning? An experimental study in French as a second language