English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The existing system of management of the quality of expert reports in Poland has serious flaws on key points. It lacks appropriate verification of experts who are put on the lists of expert witnesses (such lists are maintained by presidents of regional courts). It also lacks adequate supervision of forensic experts opinions in particular court cases. The authors illustrate these problems by an example of forensic experts who work in the area of psychology of handwriting. How many experts in the field of psychology of handwriting are put on the lists all over Poland? What do they state in their opinions? How do courts treat and supervise such experts’ reports in particular cases? The authors place the issues in the context of controversy attributed to the methodological aspect of psychology of handwriting.

PROBLEMS WITH THE MANAGEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF FORENSIC EXPERT REPORTS IN POLAND – BASED ON THE EXAMPLE OF PSYCHOLOGY OF HANDWRITING