English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Growing interest in learning objects (LOs) as a means of developing learning materials is leading to mainline LO evaluation methodologies using review instruments, such as evaluation rubrics, to suit various practical purposes. Such evaluation tools give evidence about the design and the value of the LOs, and studies performed with actual users can provide data against which these expectations of the effects of LOs on student achievements in practice can be set. This study presents a validation of a learning object review instrument (LORI) with student users (n=507) of twenty-four LOs used in K-12 environments. T he data collected through pre- and post-tests, teachers’ and students’ usability questionnaires, and the LORI revealed some interactions between those variables. However, the LORI ratings, and the usability assessments did not correlate with the learning gains of students. Some implications of these findings are discussed. Ke ywords: Learning objects, learning outcome, LORI, validation.

Validation of a Learning Object Review Instrument: Relationship between Ratings of Learning Objects and Actual Learning Outcomes