English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

To the editor: We would like to thank Dr Davies and Dr Patel for their interest in our paper. We agree with them that it is important to advance our knowledge in order to try to eliminate the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) [1]. In order to do so there are several instruments, and surveillance of SSIs is only one of them. Surveillance of SSIs is a standardised way to monitor and report SSIs, allowing comparison within and between hospitals and triggering improvement of internal processes.

Authors’ response: Is a reduced duration of post-discharge surgical site infection surveillance really in our best interests?