English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Research has found an increase in acceptance and visual quality ratings for clear cuts when members of the general public see how the forest will look once it regenerates. Yet, while more information might result in better understanding of why a landscape appears the way it does, that understanding does not always mean that people will find the landscape more acceptable. One study found that informing people about insect damage in southern pine forests lowered their preference for landscapes that showed the damage. But when no information was available, participants actually rated the insect-damage scenes higher. Researchers explained this by suggesting that participants liked the orange colors resulting from the damage in the trees.

Fuels planning: science synthesis and integration; social issues fact sheet 17: Considering social acceptability of fuels treatments