English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study examined whether or not heuristics skills such as self-regulated and metacognitive strategies differentiate significantly between high ability students. Using an experiment with purposive sample size of estimated two hundred and forty high ability students, an independent t-test conducted at alpha 0.01 suggested a high statistical difference between the experimental and control groups performed at [t=2.91, p=0.01]. This was suggestive that the control group without the self-regulated and metacognitive intervention strategies performed much lower than the experimental groups. These results were interpreted that it was the acquisition of these skills that was the predicting cause of this enhanced performance of the experimental group as opposed to the control. Self-regulated and metacognitive skills significantly fostered this adaptive competence of learners exposed to these strategies more than those who were not.

Fostering Learners Adaptive Competence: Does Acquisition of Self-Regulation and Metacognition Differentiate between Students?