English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The term Literary Canon has always been a complex issue to describe. The debate that this fact origins affects either the editorial market and higher education. In this exploratory reflection, based on the literary market observation in the last ten years, a lot of parameters are questioned. I question from the personal criteria that lead somebody to gather an anthology to the relation between canon and power. Fowler, Evan-Zohar, Sulla and Reyes, among others, have presented different approaches to the possible structure of Literary Canon: dynamic, hierarchic, primary, secondary, etc. Nonetheless, there are neither sources nor academics that openly claim if there is a known identity that establish the Canon under political, social, cultural or globalisation factors. Though, it is generally conveyed that the quality of a work is measured according to the number of languages to which it has been translated. El concepto de Canon literario siempre ha sido una cuestion compleja. El debate que origina afecta tanto al mercado literario, y por tanto editorial, como a la educacion de los estudiantes espanoles (en este caso). En esta breve reflexion, basada en la observacion del mercado literario de los ultimos diez anos, se plantean desde los criterios personales que llevan a elaborar una antologia literaria hasta la relacion entre poder y el canon literario. Fowler, Evan-Zohar, Sulla, Reyes (entre otros escritores) han planteado distintos modelos que definen la posible estructura del canon literario: dinamica, jerarquizada, primaria, secundaria, etc. Sin embargo, ninguna fuente o academico puede identificar con claridad si tras la identidad que establece el canon podemos encontrar factores politicos, sociales, globalizantes o culturales. Pese a ello, se sigue creyendo, a nivel general, que la calidad de una obra literaria se puede medir segun el numero de lenguas al cual se traduce dicha obra.

A reflection on literary canon and translation: the case of Spain in the Late 1990s and early 2000s