English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article is an overview of the work that has been conducted so far on river usage and nautical technology in the history of Angkor, and a discussion on how maritime approaches can contribute to the creation of new knowledge by opening new lines of research that can help us reconstruct a more nuanced view of Angkor’s fluvial history. Although Angkor’s connection to the river network was made in the early 20th century, the compartmentalized studies that have been carried out so far on the subject of Angkor’s relationship to its watery environment have resulted in interpretations that do not reflect the complexity of the subject. It will be argued here that archaeologists who do not integrate maritime approaches in studies of cultures like Angkor, where waterways play an important role in their environment, are likely to miss important aspects of fluvial cultures. By applying concepts such as the Maritime Cultural Landscape, it will be possible to push beyond the boundaries of terrestrial approaches and discover how the environmental conditions of cultures like Angkor – with river networks as the main means of communication – resulted in the development of specific cognitive and functional traits that gave form to fluvial cultural landscapes. An example of such an approach is offered as a conclusion in an analysis of masonry bridges in Angkor’s transport network. ជាទដឋភាពរមនៃការងារសរាវជរាវដែលបានធវើកនលងមក សតពការបរើបរាសទនលេ នងបចចេកវទយាផលវទក កនងបរវតតសាសតររាជធានអងគរ ហើយជាការជជែកថាតើមធយោបាយផលវសមទរអាចរមចណែកដលការបងកើត ចណេះដង ថម តាមរយៈការបើកខសែសរាវជរាវថមដែលអាចជយយើងឱយចនៃឡើងវញនវគហើញលាយឡព បរវតតសាសតរ ផលវទនលេរបសរាជធានអងគរ។ ទោះបទនាកទនងរាជធានអងគរជាមយបណតាញទនលេតរវបាន សកសា រច ហើយ កាលពដើមសតវតស ទ២០នោះ ការសកសាដោយបែងចែកតាមផនែកដែលបានធវើរចកនលងមក លើបរធានបទ សមពនធភាពរាជធានអងគរ ចពោះបរសថានផលវទកបានបងកឱយមានការបកសរាយដែលមនឆលះបញចាងព ភាពសាញានៃ បរធានបទនេះទេ។ អវដែលតរវ ដេញដោលនៅកនងអតថបទនេះគបរាណវទ ដែលមនបញចលមធយោបាយផលវសមទរ ចលកនងការសកសាវបបធមដែលដចរាជធានអងគរ ដែលផលវទកដើរតនាទសខាន កនងបរសថានតបននោះ ទនងជា ភលេចចណចសខាននៃវបបធមផលវទនលេហើយ។ តាមរយៈការអនវតតទសសនាទានដចជាទេសភាពវបបធមផលវសមទរ អវដែលអាចទៅរច គការរញឱយផតពរដែនមធយោបាយផលវគោក ហើយរកមើលថាតើលកខណឌបរយាកាស នៃវបបធម ដចរាជធានអងគរ ដែលមានបរពនធទនលេ ជាមធយោបាយបរាសរយទាកទងចមបង បងកឱយមានការអភវឌឍ សញញាណ ចណេះ នងមខងារជាកលាកដែលបងកើតជា ទេសភាពវបបធមផលវទនលេយាងណា។ ឧទាហរណមយនៃមធយោបាយបែបនេះ នងផតលជាការសននដឋាន កនងការវភាគសពានកបោរនានា នៅកនងបណតាញដកជញជនរបសរាជធានអងគរ។

A historiography of Angkor’s river network: shifting the research paradigm to Westerdahl’s Maritime Cultural Landscape | ការសិក្សាអំពីប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រនៃបណ្តាញផ្លូវទឹកនៅតំបន់អង្គរ៖ ការផ្លាស់ប្តូរគម្រូនៃការស្រាវជ្រាវទៅការសិក្សាផ្នែកវប្បធម៌ទេសភាពតាមផ្លូវទឹករបស់ Westerdahl