English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

O objetivo deste artigo e apontar alguns problemas na relacao entre esfera publica e emancipacao na teoria do jovem Habermas. Para tanto, o recurso a dois textos habermasianos da decada de 1960 e imprescindivel: Mudanca estrutural da esfera publica e Trabalho e Interacao . No primeiro, Habermas fundamenta sua teoria pela perspectiva de uma esfera publica normativa, possibilitada pela configuracao do periodo pos-guerra; no seguinte, alem de utilizar outra categoria esfera publica, diferente daquela normativa, sua intencao e demonstrar como os individuos se formam no âmbito privado de suas existencias. Todavia, em ambos os textos ha uma linearidade acerca da fundamentacao teorica: o trabalho e a interacao simbolica sao separados no que tange aos desenvolvimentos da humanidade. A emancipacao estaria a cargo da interacao, enquanto o trabalho somente proviria a subsistencia generica. Isto e decorrente de uma reformulacao problematica na teoria marxiana no que tange ao trabalho social e a perspectiva da totalidade. E nesse imbroglio que este artigo se situa: verificar ate que ponto o que Habermas compreende por trabalho poderia desbancar, de fato, a teoria de Marx; e, por outro lado, demonstrar que a critica dialetica marxiana acerca do trabalho social, caso levada em consideracao por Habermas, faria a teoria deste perder a logica de seus fundamentos, deslocando sua ideia de emancipacao para uma aceitacao da realidade efetiva vigente. Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to point out some problems in the relation between public sphere and emancipation on the young Habermas’s theory. Therefore, it is going to be essential to rely on two habermasians works of the 1960s: The structural transformation of the public sphere and Work and Interaction . On the first one, the book The structural transformation of the public sphere, which was first published in 1962, Habermas founds his theory by the prospect of a normative public sphere, made possible by the configuration of the post-war period; whereas on the essay Work and Interaction, from 1967, besides using another public sphere category, different from that normative, his intention is to demonstrate how individuals are formed in the private sphere of their existence. However, both in the book from 1962 and in the text from 1967, there is linearity on the theoretical foundation: concerning humanity development, work and symbolic interaction are separated. Emancipation would be in charge of interaction, while work would simply provide for the generic livelihood. This is due to a problematic reformulation of marxian theory regarding social labor and the totality perspective. It is in this imbroglio that stands the point of this paper: to verify to what extent Habermas’s understanding of work could, in fact, debunk Marx's theory; and on the other hand, to show that the marxian dialectical critique about social labor, when taken into account by Habermas, loses the logic of its foundations, shifting his idea of emancipation to an acceptance of the present actual reality. Keywords: Habermas; Public Sphere; Private Sphere; Emancipation; Marx.

pensando

Um ponto cego na teoria do jovem Habermas: A problemática relação entre Esfera Pública e Emancipação/A blind spot in the theory of young Habermas: the problematic relation between public sphere and emancipation