English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The Judicature Modernisation Bill 2013 re-enacts the operative provisions of the Judicature Amendment Act 1972. This paper analyses the re-enacted provisions, concluding that the reform will be largely successful relative to a goal of “non- substantive reform”. However, this paper argues that there were significant defects in the legislative process leading to reform, especially in terms of Parliamentary scrutiny of judicial review. In a context of a fused executive-legislative branch of government, it is highly inappropriate to legislate for judicial review without adequate consideration of the effects on judicial review powers and processes. This paper argues that judicial review procedure should not be contained in statute in order to prevent undue legislative interference.

Proceed with Caution: Law Reform, Judicial Review and the Judicature Modernisation Bill