English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recently, the right of reply was regulated by law. Recently it also became recurrent the divulgation of journalistic news regarding the involvement of legal entities in acts of corruption. Such news are most of the times, reported before there as a final decision, reason why it only report suspicions. Such news have effects over legal entities’ personality rights since it has rebounds over these legal entities’ objective honor. The purpose of this paper is to analyze if news reporting suspicions of involvement of legal entities in corruption cases enables the right of answer due to violation of objective honor.

A HONRA OBJETIVA DAS PESSOAS JURÍDICAS E O DIREITO DE REPOSTA EM FACE DE NOTÍCIAS DE SUSPEITA DE ENVOLVIMENTO EM CASOS DE CORRUPÇÃO