English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this article was to discuss the content of the Request for Provisions number 0001459.08.2016.2.00.0000, formulated by the São Paulo Lawyers Institute to the National Council of Justice, recently judged to prohibit the registration of public deeds of multiple unions. Adopting methodologies of bibliographical survey and documentary analysis, the article discusses three main points: the legal possibility of the constitution of parallel families and the production of effects in the field of Family Law; the regulatory role of the National Council of Justice and the role of the 1 Doutoranda em Direito pelo Centro Universitário de Brasília – UniCEUB/DF. Mestre em Direito e Instituições do Sistema da Justiça pela Universidade Federal do Maranhão UFMA. Professora do Curso de Direito da Unidade de Ensino Superior Dom Bosco UNDB. Assessora Jurídica no Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Maranhão. Email: bu_barbieri@yahoo.com.br 2 Mestrando em Direito Constitucional pelo Instituto Brasiliense de Direito Público – IDP/DF. Especialista em Direito Eleitoral pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais – PUC/MG e em Direito Penal Econômico pela Universidade de Coimbra. Advogado. Email: guimaraesmneto@hotmail.com Bruna Barbieri Waquim & José Guimarães Mendes Neto Revista de Direito de Família e Sucessão | e-ISSN: 2526-0227 | Porto Alegre | v. 4 | n. 2 | p. 138 – 159 | Jul/Dez. 2018 139 Extrajudicial Registry Services in private relations and, finally, the limits of the interference of the Public Power in the autonomy of the will that represents the pillar of Private Law and, in particular, the Family Law. It is concluded that the judgment of the request of measures no. 0001459.08.2016.2.00.0000 by the CNJ not only disrespects constitutional principles as the Democratic State of Law itself, by preventing individuals from voluntarily choosing the family arrangement that better suits them.

revista de direito de família e sucessão

AS FAMÍLIAS SIMULTÂNEAS E A (DES)NECESSÁRIA INTERFERÊNCIA DO PODER PÚBLICO NAS RELAÇÕES PRIVADAS: UMA ANÁLISE À LUZ DO PEDIDO DE PROVIDÊNCIAS Nº 0001459.08.2016.2.00.0000 FEITO AO CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA.