English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Research analyzed whether the declaration of unconstitutionality incidenter tantum of §1o, art. 2 of Law no 8072/90, in the judgment by the Supreme Federal Court of HC no111840/ES, guaranteed to the litigants fundamental right to symmetrical adversarial proceedings, as also if there was the application of a rhetorical principle to the case as an alibi of judicial discretion. Study made an inductive, descriptive inference, adopted the bibliographic and documentary review, through a critical examination of the votes cast, aiming to reconstruct them from the application of the process theory as a contradictory procedure and the search for a Decision Theory.

revista de direito penal, processo penal e constituição

DECLARAÇÃO INCIDENTAL DE INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE NO HC N° 111.840/ES A PARTIR DA APLICAÇÃO DA TEORIA DO PROCESSO COMO PROCEDIMENTO EM CONTRADITÓRIO E DA CRÍTICA DOS PRINCÍPIOS COMO ÁLIBI RETÓRICO DA DISCRICIONARIEDADE