English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this study is to analyze the problem of hate speech and its level of permissibility in European and inter-American human rights protection systems. The apprehension of the decision-making criterion applied by the courts in the resolution of the situations involving the hate speech allows an adequate evaluation of the respective limits of expression. In the comparison between the rules of decision-making, a clear identity is identified between the criteria applied by the European Court and the Inter-American Court, which extends even to the level of admissibility to the hate speech, which in both jurisdictions is quite limited.

revista de direitos humanos em perspectiva

DISCURSO DE ÓDIO E REGRA DE DECISÃO: UM ESTUDO SOBRE A JURISPRUDÊNCIA DA CORTE EUROPEIA DE DIRETOS HUMANOS E DA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS