English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article deals with the methodological framework of artificial intelligence and its structuring to the legal response, that is, with the law concept of algorithms in comparison with the Dworkinian interpretativism. The Hart and Dworkin debate and its insistent struggle against the descriptive rule model of social fact theory underpinned the discussion and allowed the inexorable identification of the robot's "truth set" with the aforementioned positivist theory. Dialogue develops by highlighting the succumbence of the technical perspective to the intersubjectivity paradigm, which denies the hermeneutic locus and subsumes the classical and modern metaphysics, for the understanding and subjection of the legal norm, and not the hermeneutically adequate response of the interpreter responsible for the process. comprehensive enterprise. The French context appears to sample the legislative perspective responsible for dealing with the question explored. The robot is a great chess player, but he does not understand courtesy: therefore, he cannot go into the Theory of Law and Judicial Decision. The methodology employed is hermeneutic phenomenology.

DO XADREZ À INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL: O IMPÉRIO DO DIREITO (FRANCÊS) CONTRA-ATACA