English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Nowadays, systems based on artificial intelligence (AI) have been used in the process of legal argumentation and judicial decision making. Despite the pretension of using software for the solution of legal cases, we believe that it is impossible to achieve the correction of a judicial decision without human activity. The present work aims to investigate whether, considering the pertinent aspects of Alexy's Theory of Legal Argumentation, it would be possible to grant an AI the activity of judging, from the perspective of Searle's theories. Methodologically, the deductive method is used in addition to bibliographic review to answer the introduced problem.

PODE A MÁQUINA JULGAR? CONSIDERAÇÕES SOBRE O USO DE INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL NO PROCESSO DE DECISÃO JUDICIAL