English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Judicial decisions, as an essence of state jurisdiction, are considered instruments of control of democracy and social order. The separation of powers is at the heart to understand why decisions must be respected. Also, the formalism attached to judicial decisions, must be contemplated so that all effects have their effect on the collective sense. This paper analyzes the premise that any decision, whether restricted or comprehensive, should be parameterized on a legal basis, emphasizing the need to apply, by the judiciary, the text of the Forest Code in its decisions, under penalty of spreading insecurity Legal basis.

A SEPARAÇÃO ENTRE PODERES, AS DECISÕES JUDICIAIS E A LEI DO CÓDIGO FLORESTAL: INTERCESSÕES DE UM DEBATE NECESSÁRIO EM UMA SOCIEDADE DEMOCRÁTICA